
mystic_chai16 asked: I have read many things on the internet about how “creationism” is an unthinkable and impossible subject to even consider in science. I don’t understand this. The Bible has been prooven to be very accurate, and “Creationism” has fossil records and other things that can make it plausible. Has it been disprooven? If so, then how? And evolution is still just an unprooven theory as well. There are many holes in the theory- such as the missing link, and monkeys still exist today, and most if not all living organisms would not be able to survive random genetic mutations such as the theory evolution suggests… So how is Creationism a non-scientific fairy tale? Just because it suggests the idea that an all powerful God just might exist? Who knows, maybe God created evolution to sculp our world. Would it really be so awful to offer it as an elective in public school? Either offer it, or atleast dont require those who dont like the idea of evolution to take an evolution class. One last question- why would someone want to believe that they are an evolved decendant of a monkey or lizard, rather than believe that they were formed in the image of a loving God?
__________________________________________________________________
Please dont yell at me, I am simply currious. And I have already heard that people think creation science is a retarded fairy tale for people who refuse to think hard enough to form a better reason for how the earth came into existance, and they simply make up reasons to support the conclusion. If you can, please either go into greater detail on why and give me a better answer then that, or dont answer at all.
Thank you.
ESTEBAN